Initial Thoughts...

• The elephant in the room!  A direct strike from a 3000+fps .30 caliber 30-06 will blow half a person's neck off (soft tissue) from the kinetic energy.  Indisputable reality.  From our long-standing experiences, some of us noticed that the "short subdued" sound signature of the shot coming from a non-suppressed, non-muzzled 30-06 projectile would be incorrect.  The violent nature of this extremely fast .30 caliber round would've created a louder, sharper entry sound with a lasting tail signature.

• The crime scene had no blood splatter from any exit wound in the tent behind Charlie.  All of the videos show no evidence of an exit wound.  A 30-06 projectile would've torn through his neck and create a bloody mess on the tent's rear wall.

• "Tyler" did not have a 50" rifle when he jumped off the roof.  Clear, indisputable evidence.  To dispute this clear evidence, the Feds claimed that he disassembled the rifle first before jumping off the roof... to then reassemble it back and leave it in the woods?  In fact, we've seen new video where it has been doctored to elongate his bag to fit the "rifle missing" paradox.  By doctoring the original footage just means that it's an admittal to the original lie.  Also, did anyone notice that this video fails to show a shadow from "Tyler" running off the white part of the roof?  I'm hoping that a lighting expert would be able to explain this.

• The Fed narrative states that the gunman had to disassembled his rifle before running off the roof.  However, clear footage shows someone running on the roof immediately after the shot.  When did he have time to disassemble the rifle?

• A 30-06 rifle cannot be stuffed down anyone's skinny jeans, it will be much more prominent to identify and you would not be able to bend the leg in the least.  The videos showing "Tyler" performing a limp does reveal he was able to bend both his legs substantially without the hindrance of a straight long barrel firearm.

• The Feds released a photo of the weapon stating the time it was obtained when there was clearly daylight.  Why was the photo shot in the dark where they needed to use a flashlight to display it?

• The Feds claimed to have found the rifle with one spent round still in tact in the firing chamber.  BUT, what they fail to explain is that you cannot disassemble the firearm with the bolt carrier in place.  You'd have to:
  
  
  
  1. pull the bolt carrier out first, which in turn would eject the spent shell case
  2. manually unscrewing 3 long screws on the bottom of the stock
  3. this disassembly would create plethora of many parts - freeing all unfired bullets, freeing the barrel with scope, the rifle stock, the trigger guard, the magazine spring, the 3 loose screws, a screwdriver, AND the spent shell casing as your prized possession.
  4. the Mauser action length is approximagely 9", the rifle's barrel will be about 22", the scope was set back about 3" behind the action - totaling about 34" inches in length.  Tyler's backpack CANNOT hold this, not even a backpack that is considered large.  Only a larger, long duffle bag can hold this length.
  
  We are also to believe that the shooter, while on the run, decides to reassemble the entire firearm, all it's parts listed above, to then load back all unfired shells first, then the empty casing to complete their "memorial tribute"?  Only to then leave it for the Feds?  Absolute ridiculous theology.  The Feds believe that the American people are that stupid.

• The Fed narrative was that the assassin was changing his outfits?  The only reasoning we feel that'll explain this false narrative is to help the Feds tie in their events of photos and videos.  Completely disingenuous and complete fabrication.

• The Fed narrative posted the 'alleged text messages' between "Tyler" and his gay lover, which was the WORST decision they ever made because it exposed them to their obvious amateur and poorly articulated, doctored dialogue.
  
  Candace Owens offers compelling counterpoints picking apart the fake Fed narrative:
  https://www.youtube.com/live/2WEHTk0Xewg (part 1)
  https://www.youtube.com/live/sreYYcID-QY (part 2)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDlhjfW6hz8 (part 3)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDlhjfW6hz8 (part 4)
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDlhjfW6hz8 (part 5)

• There appears to be a professional high frame rate camera recording within 10 feet of Charlie.  Why weren't these discussed or offered to support the Fed's evidence?
  This footage can be crucial in explaining everything - why aren't these high speed videos being released publicly?
  
  
  
  

• Why did unknown persons, who clearly were checking for witnesses around him, immediately took down the rear camera to remove something from it.  Was it the SSD storage card?  Was it something else?  This camera can offer compelling evidence if he was shot from behind, instead of in front.
  
  
  
  Update: Candace Owens has spoken to this person who apparently is from TPU.  She claims that she was not able to see anything "gorey" through a Face Time connection.
  Our thoughts is that entry wounds into Charlie's dark hair will not be easily seen through secondary video transmission. An actual autopsy (to this date, hasn't been revealed publicly) would reveal the bullet's path.

• Who is the security personnel (blue shirt/khaki pants, corrective glasses) that suspiciously was holding something in his right hand tucking it under his left armpit pointing at Charlie. What is a weapon? Trigger remote of some sort? We find this behavior to be very odd just seconds before the shot was taken.
  
  
  
  

• Why did this same security personnel (blue shirt/khaki pants, corrective glasses) immediately hide the object in his right pants pocket immediately after the shot.  Indisputable video fact.  Hiding the item was the immediate priority after the shot.  What was this all about?  A very odd observation.

• There's a lot of speculation if Charlie was wearing an steel plate armor vest?  This would help explain how a 30-06 would've killed him by a deflection of part of the bullet or shrapnel off the armor. You can see that Charlie had a magnetic microphone inside his shirt on his right side, nothing on his left.  An armor plate, even at the smallest form factor to cover his vital organs would've been noticeable through a T-shirt.  You are also able to see that his T-shirt touched his sternum, left pectoral and nipple without any obstruction from an armor plate.  There are times when Charlie touched his own chest while speaking and his hands which definitively shows his fingers reaching his chest, nothing solid or rigid in between.
  We will debunk this armor plate rumor further below showing Charlie was NOT wearing armor plates.  The media stated that his security detail claimed that he was - however we find this to be FALSE.

• Recent events that clearly tells us that the Feds are lying:  Candace Owens releases an unseen photo of Tyler Robinson at a Dairy Queen, in Orem Utah, at 6:38pm, after the Charlie Kirk assassination.  He is seen, unbothered and calm, in a maroon shirt, blue jeans, hat and sunglasses.  The Dairy Queen is about 17 minutes from the campus.  How was he able to get there in such short time, seemed calm and curious, make a food order, in changed clothing?
  
  
  

• As of now, what seems to be the most plausible?
  
  Initial Thoughts:  It "appears" that the shot came from behind, downward, from the rear camera's point of view.
  
  
  1. Remember when ask previously, where's the footage from that high speed camera that was set up to face Charlie from his left side?  A video, possibly from "this" camera, or from another high speed camera, that was sent to us for analysis.  While running it frame by frame, this video footage could have possibly captured a downward projectile that is inline and within timing after passing through Charlie's neck.  Not a frame glitch because it was captured in a few frames, moving downward.  (We've updated our thoughts about this below towards our conclusion.)
     
     

  2. Another very noticeable anomaly showed an instantaneous lighting distortion, or "projectile", against the tent's wall black lettering "COM" under the rear camera at the time of the shot.  Best guess is that this might've been caused by either violent air/lighting disruption from the detonation of the projectile - synonymous with a muzzle blast from a barrel... OR possibly the "projectile" itself?  An incoming bullet would not have caused this disruption behind him.  (We've updated our thoughts about this below towards our conclusion.)
     
     You can see this for yourself, you can still view original online footage of the graphic event (in full screen) to witness the "COM" lettering flicker when "something" passes over. https://x.com/flemishfirst1/status/1965851830287802398.
     
     
     
     
  3. There was considerable amount of spacing between the tent's ceiling and back wall.  Coincidently, 2 "cameras" which are inline with our belief where the shot originated from were also installed there.  (We've updated our thoughts about this below towards our conclusion.)
     
        
     
     
  4. The bleeding wound we witness is an exit wound.  Judging from how clean it exited without causing major splatter, we initially believed it was a close range shot - direct straight spin without wobble, highest FPS possible.  Exit wounds are typically larger and bleed out more profusely, like what we saw with Charlie.  Entry wounds are much smaller and will bleed slower because its inertia and destructive forced is pushed back into the flesh (internal our outward bleeding).
      
     There have been other analysis from other videos that was filming Charlie from behind on his right side, videos that we have not yet studied, which also reveals a disruption of sorts behind Charlie's head instantaneous with the shot.  These video however do not show an entry wound of any sort because we feel that Charlie was struck towards the left neck / cranial area.
      
  5. Charlie's T-shirt's sudden behavior was caused by rapid air flow & inertia caused by the projectile that exited his neck.
      
  6. So, if it's an exit wound, where is the projectile?  At this time, our best guess, somewhere in the ground.  Which would explain the reasoning behind why Charlie's entire tent area (crime scene) was immediately excavated and concreted in 5 days time, before any further investigation can happen.  Thanks to the Feds, case is closed, scene has been secured from any further scrutiny.
     
     
     
     
      
  7. OK, now you're off the deep end.  Maybe, maybe not.  We're just following whatever plausible evidence and having military experience and ballistics knowledge to help come up with plausible possibilities.  The Feds have not presented anything to us that was remotely plausible.
     
     WE STARTED LOOKING AT MORE FOOTAGE, OPENING MORE POSSIBILITIES...
     
     Was The Shooter's Location Revealed?
     
     There is a circulating video that shows a muzzle flash from an "assumed" open window/door from a building just right from Charlie at the exact time you hear the shot.  Being that this location is fairly close, it's plausible that it can be the source of a very easy kill shot, down to a 1/4" MOA accuracy.  This theory technically supports the idea that the bullet exited his neck and most likely landed into the ground to his left.  This video's evidence is very compelling with.. 1.) showing the visible muzzle flash, 2.) at a close higher ground, 3.) less than 1/3rd the distance the Feds are claiming, 4.) flash coinciding with the sound of the shot.  Initially, it was difficult for us to believe that the shooter behind this covert assassination would be so sloppy to risk exposing their position by not suppressing the flash.
     
     
     
     Update: Candace Owens has stated that she saw this but she's also in possession of much more extensive footage than anyone else.  After her review, she explained that these windows cannot be opened (to what she can see, and to her knowledge.)
     
     Reviewing the footage again, frame by frame, we now see what appears to be that Charlie was struck in his head, just behind his right ear, because of what looks like possible "blood splatter" off his head.
     
     Remember when we mentioned earlier that we thought the bullet might've came from directly behind him because the tent's letter "COM" showed some type of distortion, we now strongly believe that this distortion was caused by the possible "blood splatter", or unknown object, that instantly occurred when Charlie was hit from behind his ear.
     
     Also remember, when we mentioned earlier that it appears the bullet was caught moving downward "between" Charlie's legs, if in fact this was the bullet... is was probably not caught in between his legs, but rather to the LEFT of Charlie's left leg.  The camera's angle being on Charlie's left side, but positioned more towards his front, gave it an illusion that it passed in between his legs.
     
     
     
     Could this be "blood splatter"?  What is this?  We do believe that even if it wasn't "blood splatter", this bleeding wound is STILL the exit wound.
     
     
     
     Possibly not "Blood Splatter", Most Likely An Earpiece, or was it something else? ...
     
     There is also visible evidence that Charlie was wearing something - an earpiece perhaps? It appeared to have blown off his head when it was struck.
     
     
     
     
     Update: Candace Owens has stated that this was not an earpiece.  Examining other footage that she has in her possession, she claims that Charlie was wearing a necklace.
     
     
     Our Current Theory 9/19/25:
     It is our belief that Charlie was shot from a higher ground to his right side, striking his head from behind his ear, bullet exiting through his neck.
     Note: This belief can be changed upon any new data.
     
     
     Other Theory Being Investigated:
     There is circulating "evidence" that Charlie's magnetic microphone was the weapon.  That it detonated under his shirt, consistant with thie shirt reaction, shooting him in the right side of his neck, exiting the left side.  This would explain why there were several individuals immediately rushing to Charlie to "take something" from him.  Plus, there was a visible hand-off of some sort from the front security to another - speculated to be the remote trigger.  This would also explain why Charlie's security would stand to his right that day, when they are always standing on his left side during his other campus events.
     
     Must See Footage Of Analysis Of Microphone detonation: https://youtu.be/GV1nn8LaA1U?si=anZcvDlVghFtdWbf
     
     Must See Footage The Players Involved From An Obvious Inside Job: https://youtu.be/B6XEQGyyrPE?si=RPl5hiAAeascHBgr
     
     Just recently, other Youtube videos have offered their analysis to how Charlie was shot.
     However you slice it, the FBI's narrative is an absolute lie.
     
     

     
      

  8. It is abundantly clear that Charlie's assassination was a planned coordinated event, but not from Tyler Robinson.  The Fed's mission, along with the help from the media & politicians, is to quickly solve the case with their forced fake narrative and poor investigative clarity.  Trying to stage a public open event, while there are hundreds of mobile cameras, University footage, witnesses, is almost impossible - they obviously felt their close range operation was rock solid when all eyes would be pointing to a lone "sniper" on the opposite side.  Unfortunately for Charlie Kirk, a man of truth, faith and free speech, might never have the truth be revealed on why he was assassinated. May he be in a better place with God.
      
     
     Uncensored video of the assassination events has already been downloaded but there are still many online versions that can be seen, for example: https://x.com/flemishfirst1/status/1965851830287802398